首页> 外文OA文献 >Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Detection: Comparison of Two Molecular Methods (IDI-MRSA PCR Assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR Assay) with Three Selective MRSA Agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA) for Use with Infection-Control Swabs▿
【2h】

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Detection: Comparison of Two Molecular Methods (IDI-MRSA PCR Assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR Assay) with Three Selective MRSA Agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA) for Use with Infection-Control Swabs▿

机译:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)检测:两种分子方法(IDI-MRSA PCR分析和GenoType MRSA直接PCR分析)与三种选择性MRSA琼脂(MRSA ID,MRSASelect和CHROMagar MRSA)的比较,用于感染控制拭子▿

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an increasing problem. Rapid detection of MRSA-colonized patients has the potential to limit spread of the organism. We evaluated the sensitivities and specificities of MRSA detection by two molecular methods (IDI-MRSA PCR assay and GenoType MRSA Direct PCR assay) and three selective MRSA agars (MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA), using 205 (101 nasal, 52 groin, and 52 axillary samples) samples from consecutive known MRSA-infected and/or -colonized patients. All detection methods had higher MRSA detection rates for nasal swabs than for axillary and groin swabs. Detection of MRSA by IDI-MRSA was the most sensitive method, independent of the site (94% for nasal samples, 80% for nonnasal samples, and 90% overall). The sensitivities of the GenoType MRSA Direct assay and the MRSA ID, MRSASelect, and CHROMagar MRSA agars with nasal swabs were 70%, 72%, 68%, and 75%, respectively. All detection methods had high specificities (95 to 99%), independent of the swab site. Extended incubation for a further 24 h with selective MRSA agars increased the detection of MRSA, with a corresponding decline in specificity secondary to a significant increase in false-positive results. There was a noticeable difference in test performance of the GenoType MRSA Direct assay in detection of MRSA (28/38 samples [74%]) compared with detection of nonmultiresistant MRSA (17/31 samples [55%]) (susceptible to two or more non-β-lactam antibiotics). This was not observed with selective MRSA agar plates or IDI-MRSA. Although it is more expensive, in addition to rapid turnaround times of 2 to 4 h, IDI-MRSA offers greater detection of MRSA colonization, independent of the swab site, than do conventional selective agars and GenoType MRSA Direct.
机译:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是一个日益严重的问题。快速检测MRSA菌落定植的患者有可能限制生物体的扩散。我们使用205(101鼻腔,52腹股沟)通过两种分子方法(IDI-MRSA PCR检测和GenoType MRSA Direct PCR检测)和三种选择性MRSA琼脂(MRSA ID,MRSASelect和CHROMagar MRSA)评估了MRSA检测的敏感性和特异性。 (以及52个腋窝样本)样本,这些样本来自连续已知的受MRSA感染和/或定殖的患者。所有检测方法的鼻拭子MRSA检测率均高于腋窝和腹股沟拭子。通过IDI-MRSA检测MRSA是最敏感的方法,与位点无关(鼻样本为94%,非鼻样本为80%,总体为90%)。 GenoType MRSA Direct测定法和带有鼻拭子的MRSA ID,MRSASelect和CHROMagar MRSA琼脂的敏感性分别为70%,72%,68%和75%。所有检测方法均具有高特异性(95%至99%),与拭子部位无关。与选择性MRSA琼脂进一步温育24小时可提高MRSA的检测率,继而假阳性结果显着增加则特异性相应下降。与检测非多重耐药性MRSA(17/31样本[55%])(对两个或多个以上敏感)相比,GenoType MRSA Direct检测法在检测MRSA(28/38样本[74%])中的测试性能有显着差异。非β-内酰胺类抗生素)。选择性MRSA琼脂平板或IDI-MRSA未观察到这一点。尽管价格昂贵,但除了需要2到4小时的快速周转时间外,与传统的选择性琼脂和GenoType MRSA Direct相比,IDI-MRSA还提供了更大的MRSA菌落检测能力,而不受拭子部位的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号